gingery_machines @Wiki hexapod

Menu

FrontPage
FAQ
Index
Machine
#construction
##design
##foundations
##patternmaking
##casting
###lostfoam
###gas furnace

#designs
##lathe
###modifications
##shaper
##bootstrap
##hexapod

#usage
##sharpening

Gingery
#series
#explanations

Editorials
#authors

WishList
Legal

This page:
1435hits total
3hits today
Trackback(0) Referer(145)

Hexapod


The portable machine tool of the future.

News!
4/17/06: I have begun work in earnest on a small hexapod milling machine codenamed "hextatic"

Why a hexapod?
  • The variable length struts all point directly towards the end effector. All force vectors are directly along a strut. There is only tension or compression, and no bending anywhere in the (ideal) structure. This leads to a very rigid and lightweight structure, similar in function to a geodesic dome.
  • The total error is averaged over all six actuators, instead of accumulating error as in a stacked slide (milling machine) or serial rotary joint mechanism (robot arm). Similarly, wear is evenly distributed.
  • All six actuators work together to move the platform, providing higher power/weight ratios since less time is spent idle per actuator. The high rigidity and low mass allow for very high acceleration rates, making feasible techniques such as high speed machining and active vibration compensation.
  • The machine is composed of multiple identical parts, greatly simplifying manufacture, design, and repair.
  • It is easily disassembled, shipped, and reassembled on-site. Machines with an enclosing frame (such as the ingersoll octahedral hexapod ) do not require heavy foundations or precision leveling.

Under construction. Sorry! Well, would you rather have me work on a real-life model, or sit here and write about what other people are doing?
item vote
work on a real life example (18)
write about what other people are doing (1)



pros cons workarounds build test reiterate

some ideas:
use an airmotor (or tesla_turbine ?) as the spindle drive motor, saving on mass, space, and heat buildup per spindle horsepower

tube-shaped ballscrews ? with internal tension and viscoelastic damping layer

delrin ACME ? anti-backlash nuts for the cheap prototype

For a small prototype, I'm planning on using a rollerblade bearing u-joint for 2-dof linkages similar to what's found on the FANUC F-100i robot
Fanuc F-100i robot
The F-100i is capable of a static payload of 140kg in a vertical direction and 75 kg in a horizontal direction. It seems to be less than one meter tall, and weighs somewhere around 100 kg. It's not in production, unfortunately. It seems to have been eclipsed by the much less aesthetically pleasing
f-200iB:
http://www.fanuc.co.jp/en/product/robot/lineup/f200ib.html
The F-200iB has a functional work envelope in the shape of a cylinder, with diameter 500mm and height 300 mm, but the full work envelope is a complex lenticular shape about 1 meter in diameter and 500mm in height. Repeatability is within 0.2mm. The robot is 800-1300mm tall, 630mm in diameter, and weighs 190kg. It is capable of moving a 100kg payload, has a maximum speed of 1.5m/s, and is primarily intended for welding and assembly applications. Just to give you some idea of what the run of the mill hexapod is like.


Hexapods are also sometimes called (for your googling pleasure)
Stewart Platforms
Parallel Link Manipulators
Parallel Machine Tools
Geodetic machine tools
geodesic machine tools
octahedral hexapod

A hexapod that uses flexible cables instead of ballscrews or hydraulic cylinders is called a robocrane, at least that's what it's called by the guys at NIST.

links:

Pictures of the NIST/Ingersoll prototype octahedral hexapod:
http://www.mel.nist.gov/photos/photo/phexa99.html

hexapod cad drawings, inspiration, hexapod design engineering software, code bits:
http://www.i-way.co.uk/~storrs/lme/LMEHexapodMachine.html

double ball bar procedure and calculations for a hexapod:
http://precnt.prec.kyoto-u.ac.jp/mmc/research/para/ishida/pa_ishida.html

parallel mechanisms info center. history, comparison, nomenclature
http://www.parallemic.org/

forward kinematics translation equations. fortunately we dont have to do this thanks to EMC (I think):
http://www.enee.umd.edu/medlab/papers/robautforsem97/robautforsem97.html

EMC. Enhanced Machine Controller. Linux realtime motion planner, cnc controller, step sequence generator, live/preview tool path , and more:
http://www.linuxcnc.org/

Hexel owns the trademark for "Hexapod." Fuzzybunnies. Thanks for raping the information commons, guys. Send them your hate mail:
http://www.hexel.com/

Most folk ignore "Hexapod" as a patented/trademarked word much the same way we ignore the "Windows" thing when we put clear panes of glass in our homes. If it becomes a problem with cash down the line, call it a Stewart Platform. That is well beyond the experation date.








I am carefully avoiding any mention of "that other hexapod robot" that is really stupid and serves no purpose whatsoever. Also avoiding any terms that are commonly used to describe it, so that people searching and doing a NOT boolean operation won't cancel out this page.

mostly ideas generated by fenn

recent changes